Tuesday, June 3, 2008

K-3 Money in Cave Creek Unified Schools

Tonight the board may vote on a call for election to renew the K-3 override. As you may or may not know, the state is now funding all day kindergarten. So where did the state kindergarten money go? Do it go to kindergarten? Do it go to reduce K-3 class size? Did it help pay for more teachers or aides at the elementary level?

No, the district in its infinite wisdom decided that since the budget was already set, they would take the state money earmarked for the kindergarten children and "provide additional salary increases across the board for certified, classified and administration." Yes, they took $600,000 to be spent in the classroom and gave some of it to administrators and non-instructional staff. So now the district is in a position that it must have the K-3 override renewed or teachers will have to be let go.

Brilliant!

Update: Looks like the meeting was last night and the board voted to put the K-3 on the November ballot. Best of luck to CCUSD.


------

Excerpt from the CCUSD Governing Board minutes, 3/13/2007

3.1 K-3 Override Presentation – This item has been carried over two times. Copy of pamphlet language is not included tonight. Questions on how K3 Override money is being spent and whether or not it is being spent on items reflected in the election pamphlet was recently questioned. The budgeted amount is $868,039 for this year and it pays for 11.5 full time K teachers, 4.68 teacher aides and 5.0 instructional coaches (teachers). Professional development is also in there, along with $15,229 for capital expenditure. The list of schools and teachers tied to this funding was provided. M&O pays for ½ and K3 pays for ½ of the teacher’s salaries. This assists in the class size reduction. Dollars and how allocated were provided. Group B K weight money was discussed. Legislature at the last minute provided this money and by that time our budget was already decided and adopted. $622,203.31 is amount we are receiving this year. Allocation of that money was used to provide additional salary increases across the board for certified, classified and administration. Discussion: Member Clancy asked if this reduced class sizes throughout the District. Bulk of money is used for full day K, effect on class size overall is minimal. We added two teachers across five schools and six grade levels. The bond language called for paying for full day kindergarten first, reduce class size was second and third was to add additional assistance. Elementary class sizes are reduced to 20-22 students at K-3 level, which is reduced from 26. Ballot language said it “could be used.” As long as we are meeting any of the three, we meet the language of the ballot. K is at 21, some may be a little more if there are only a couple extra kids.

7 comments:

  1. Thanks for explaining "where the money went". I know I was having a hard time figuring out what they did with the state approved all day K $'s. Guess we should not be suprised that it did not go to the kids.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Keeping teacher pay at a level adequate to keep good teachers is helping the kids! DUH!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear "June 4, 2008 4:31 PM",

    We have no problem with the money going to the teachers. Our problem is spending classroom money outside the classroom.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How do you expect a district this size to function without administrative personnel? Have you even contrasted this district's budget line by line with top districts in other states? I would be shocked to find it coming near those budgets even in the adminstrative areas because education is so underfunded in this state. If you have a problem with the education at CCUSD, fix the problems with the legislature that is underfunding a district of this size.

    No Child Left Behind, a well intentioned, but never funded federal government initiative is what has killed school districts. There are much heavier administrative needs in all school districts because of increased special ed requirements, increased esl requirements etc.

    This is not just a CCUSD problem. It is all over. Administration overhead has grown in all districts. I came from a district with double the spending on each student, the district was reknowned, and I am not finding the huge differences in education or administration that you do. What I do find is that there is an underlying current of antitax militants in the area who will try to undercut this district in a very underhanded way.

    Which administrative positions do you propose to get rid of and why? Which do you think are overpaid or unecessary when compared to typical salaries for similar districts? What are the salaries and number of positions in this district compared to some of the districts that you are saying are so much better than ours?

    ReplyDelete
  5. THANK YOU - THANK YOU - THANK YOU, June 4, 2008 8:31 p.m. - THANK YOU.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also agree with anonymous on June 4. Every penny the district spends is regularly audited. Please compare the CCUSD budget with comparably sized district in the valley and show me where they spend less money and how they get by with fewer administrators. The school I work in has a prinicpal and an assistant principal and they both work very long hours and their pay is less than most private business positions that require the amount of education that they have. Having been in the district for almost 20 years I can tell you that, in my opinion, money is not being spent haphazardly. Every penny must be accounted for and stretched as far as is humanly possible.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well you district apologists must have missed this post...

    Answer: Not in the Classroom

    CCUSD ranks below the average and near the bottom in districts of similar size again according to the State Auditor.

    See page 32 here...

    Arizona Public School Districts’ Dollars Spent in the Classroom, Fiscal Year 2007

    ReplyDelete

Anyone can comment but profane or defamatory comments will be removed.